Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02180-w

Left-ventricular Unloading with Impella® during Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated With Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation – An International Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
T. Thevathasan1, L. Füreder1, M. Fechtner1, S. R. Mørk2, C. J. Terkelsen2, C. Gaisendrees3, T. Unoki4, A. L. Axtell5, K. Takeda6, A. V. Vinogradsky6, P. G. Teixeira7, A. Lemaire8, M. Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta9, H. S. Lim10, A. R. Garan11, A. Bindra12, K. J. Lingle12, U. Landmesser1, C. Skurk1, für die Studiengruppe: IRUCA
1CC 11: Med. Klinik für Kardiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin; 2Department of Cardiology,, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DK; 3Herzzentrum - Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln; 4Division of Translational Research, Kyoto Medical Center,, Kyoto, JP; 5Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, US; 6Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery,, Columbia University, New York, US; 7Department of Cardiology, Hospital de São Francisco Porto, Porto, PT; 8Department of Surgery, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, US; 9Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, ES; 10Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; 11Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, US; 12Department of Cardiology, Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation, Texas, US;

Background: Recent international guidelines recommend the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Recent data from smaller cohort studies suggest that additional unloading with left-ventricular (LV) Impella® pump (“ECMELLA”) during ECPR might be associated with survival benefits compared to VA-ECMO therapy alone. The “International Registry on Unloading during Cardiac Arrest” (IRUCA) working group hypothesized that ECMELLA treatment during refractory cardiac arrest was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than VA-ECMO treatment in this first systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022339499).

Methods: Four blinded investigators of the IRUCA group performed the systematic literature review according to the PRISMA checklist by including clinical studies published between January 2017 and June 2022 on Medline, CENTRAL, Embase and abstract websites of large cardiology societies in the United States and Europe. If mortality data were not reported, aggregated data was retrieved from corresponding authors. The meta-analysis was performed by using a random-effects model.  Heterogeneity was tested with Cochrane Q test and publication bias with funnel plots.

Results: 129 records were screened in total, of which 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 1,038 adult patients with ECPR due to refractory cardiac arrest were included, out of which 255 (24.6%) received ECMELLA therapy and 783 (75.4%) received VA-ECMO therapy (see patient characteristics in Table). Compared to patients with VA-ECMO, patients with ECMELLA had more frequently shockable ECG rhythms, acute myocardial infarctions and percutaneous coronary interventions. ECMELLA treatment was associated with a 48% reduction in mortality [95% CI 0.30-0.89] compared to VA-ECMO treatment alone (P= 0.017). Study heterogeneity was not remarkable (I2=38.02%). The results remained robust in sensitivity analyses after excluding smaller studies or gray literature.

Conclusion: LV unloading with Impella® in patients with VA-ECMO was associated with improved survival across institutions and might be considered in selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest. ECMELLA use and mortality rates differed between institutions. Further scientific evidence is urgently required to formulate standardized guidelines on LV unloading during ECPR.

 


 


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2023/aV2012.html