Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02180-w

New treatment concept for ICD patients with first appropriate ICD shock is associated with better outcome
T. Kleemann1, E. Lampropoulou1, K. Kouraki1, M. Strauß1, O. Mohammad1, A.-R. Wenz1, R. Zahn1
1Medizinische Klinik B, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein;

Introduction: Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) receiving appropriate ICD-shocks are known to have a worse prognosis. We recently developed a new treatment concept for ICD-patients with appropriate ICD shock, the ToVAMI protocol, which consists of the following three steps: Trigger optimization, Ventricular Arrhythmia treatment and Medical and Interventional prognostic heart failure treatment. This protocol was implemented into clinical practice since 9/2018. Aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the ToVAMI protocol on the outcome of patients with first appropriate ICD shock. Methods and Results: A total of 255 consecutive patients of a prospective single-centre ICD-registry who received a first appropriate ICD shock between 2012 and 8/2022 were analyzed. Patients with first ICD shock between 2012 and 8/2018 (control group, n = 175) were compared with patients with first ICD shock between 9/2018 and 6/2021 who were treated according to the ToVAMI protocol (ToVAMI group n = 80). Prospective use of the ToVAMI approach increased the rate of identified triggers (42% vs. 60%), VA therapy (34% vs. 51%), and tripled the rate of optimised heart failure treatment.  Patients treated according to the ToVAMI protocol had better survival without recurrent ICD shock (73% versus 55% at two years, p = 0.02) (Figure 1). This was mainly due to a decrease in recurrent ICD-shocks from 48% to 25% at two years (p = 0.01), while all-cause mortality showed only a trend towards lower mortality at two years (19% versus 10%, p = 0.32). In a multivariate analysis adjusting for 10 parameters, the ToVAMI approach was independently associated with a lower combined endpoint of mortality and repeated ICD shocks. Conclusion: The use of ToVAMI in patients with first ICD shock is associated with a reduction of the combined endpoint of mortality and recurrence of appropriate ICD shocks.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients at first ICD shock


 
   Control group
(n = 175)
 ToVAMI group
(n = 80)
 p-value
 Age (years)  69 + 11  67 + 12  n.s.
Female sex  16%  14%  n.s.
 EF < 30 %  74%  81%  n.s.
 Ischemic heart disease  61%  64%  n.s.
 Diabetes  31%  29%  n.s.
 Renal impairment  21%  34%  0.03
 Primary prophylactic ICD  70%  68%  n.s.
 CRT ICD  26%  18%  n.s.
 ACE/ARB/ARNI  95%  88%  0.04
 Beta blocker  94%  89%  n.s.
 Spironolactone  63%  68%  n.s.
 VF shock  47%  52%  n.s.
 Electrical storm  23%  34%  0.07
 Trigger prevalence  42%  60%  0.009
 Ventricular arrhythmia therapy  34%  51%  0.008
 Medical and interventional prognostic heart failure therapy  13%  42%  < 0.001


Figure 1



https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2023/aV1097.html