Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02180-w

Efficacy of oral combination lipid lowering and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in “difficult-to-treat” high risk patients referred to a specialized outpatient lipid clinic
M. Fischer1, M. Muck2, M. Hamerle2, D. Sander2, U. Hubauer2, L. S. Maier2, C. Strack2, A. Bäßler2
1Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Caritas Krankenhaus St. Lukas Kelheim GmbH, Kelheim; 2Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Med. II, Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg;

Background: Current ESC/EAS guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidemias recommend more aggressive targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients at high cardiovascular (CV) risk and in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Standard lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) is often inadequate to achieve these targets, particularly in patients with high baseline LDL-C and/or statin intolerance. In these “difficult-to-treat” patients specifically referred to our specialized lipid outpatient clinic we analyzed achievement of LDL-C targets with oral combination LLT (consisting of statin, and/or bempedoic acid and ezetimibe) in comparison to PCSK9-inhibitor (PCSK9i) treatment. 

Methods: Since 2017, 1062 patients were referred to our outpatient lipid clinic and were followed repeatedly. Of these, 996 at very high (n=824) or high (n=172) CV risk were treated according to current ESC/EAS guidelines to reach LDL-C targets <55 and <70 mg/dl, respectively. The reduction in LDL-C and the number of patients reaching the LDL-C treatment target were investigated by comparing baseline data with the most recent values. 

Results:  Patients (n=583 men, n=413 women, mean age 56±14 yrs.) had LDL-C levels of 199±76 mg/dL on average at first presentation; 40.7% reported statin intolerance, limiting their ability to tolerate a dosage necessary to achieve LDL-C targets. After at least 3 follow-up visits (n=416) 189 (45.4%) received oral combination LLT therapy, 185 (44.5%) received PCSKi in combination with oral LLT (when oral LLT was insufficient) and 42 (10.1%) received PCSK9i monotherapy. LDL-C was reduced by 60±17% (-113±62 mg/dL) using oral combination LLT, by 73±20% (-170±84 mg/dL) using PSCK9i plus oral LLT (p<0.0001), compared to 59±24% (-115±59 mg/dL) with PCSK9i only. Based on the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines the percentage of patients achieving LDL reduction ≥50% from baseline was 80.0% (oral LLT), 90.2% (PCSK9i plus oral LLT), and 73.8% (PCSK9i mono). Achievement of ESC targets was 57.2% (oral LLT), 65.8% (PCSK9i plus oral LLT), and 51.2% (PCSK9i mono).

Conclusions: More than half “difficult-to-treat” high risk patients referred to a specialized lipid clinic because of high baseline LDL-C values, FH, and/or statin intolerance achieve LDL-C targets with oral combination lipid lowering therapy. The remaining are candidates for PCSK9i therapy and, thus, another considerable proportion (~two-thirds) can be successful treated on this way. However, closely monitoring with several follow-up visits and treatment modifications are necessesary to reach this goal.

 


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2023/aP893.html