Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02180-w

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Rest and Exercise-Stress Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index to Detect Diastolic Dysfunction
S. J. Backhaus1, T. Lange1, A. Schulz1, R. Evertz1, S. Frey2, G. Hasenfuß1, A. Schuster1
1Herzzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen; 2Abt. für Kardiologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, CH;

Background:

Even though left atrial and ventricular dysfunction are inter-linked in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) they are often studied as sole entities, and little is known about atrial ventricular inter-play and relation to cardiac decompensation. We hypothesized that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) would be of high diagnostic yield to identify pathophysiological alterations in HFpEF and would be both amenable to rest and ergometer stress CMR testing with high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of HFpEF.

Methods:

Patient with exertional dyspnoea, signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’ ≥8) and preserved EF (≥50%) on echocardiography were prospectively recruited and classified as HFpEF (n=34) or non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD, n=34) according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) on right heart catheterisation (rest/stress: ≥15/25 mmHg). Left atrial and ventricular (LA/LV) volumes were assessed on short-axis real-time cine sequences at rest and during exercise-stress. LACI was defined as the ratio of the LA/LV end-diastolic volume. Cardiovascular hospitalisation (CVH) was assessed after 24 months.

Results:

Volume-derived LA (p≥0.008) but not LV (p≥0.347) morphology and function at rest and during exercise-stress detected significant differences comparing HFpEF and NCD. There was impaired atrio-ventricular coupling in HFpEF at rest (LACI 45.7 vs 31.6 %, p<0.001) and during exercise-stress (45.7 vs 27.9 %, p<0.001). LACI correlated with PCWP at rest (r=0.48, p<0.001) and during exercise-stress (r=0.55, p<0.001). At rest, LACI was the only volumetry derived parameter to differentiate NCD and HFpEF patients which were identified using exercise-stress thresholds (p=0.001). Resting and exercise-stress LACI dichotomised at their medians were associated CVH (p≤0.005).

Conclusions:

Assessment of LACI is a simple approach for LA/LV coupling quantification and allows easy and fast identification of HFpEF.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2023/aP555.html