Clin Res Cardiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02180-w

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Protamine in Reducing Bleeding Complications during TAVI: A Propensity-Matched Comparison
K. Kneizeh1, A. Milzi1, F. Vogt1, K. Witte1, N. Marx1, M. Lehrke1, M. Almalla1, J. Schröder1, für die Studiengruppe: TAVI Aachen
1Med. Klinik I - Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen;

Objectives : We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose protamine in reducing access site-related complications during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) as compared to full-dose protamine.

Background: Access site-related complications represent an independent predictor of poor outcome of TAVI. Data regarding heparin reversal with protamine and the dosage needed to prevent bleeding complications is scarce.

Methods : A total of 897 patients were retrospectively included in the study. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention recently before or concomitantly with TAVI were given 0.5mg protamine for each 100 units unfractionated heparin. All other patients were considered as a control group and 1mg protamine for each 100 units heparin was administered. The protocol for this study was approved by the local ethics committee. 

Results : The combined endpoint of intra-hospital death, life-threatening, major bleeding and major vascular complication was significantly more frequent in patients receiving low-dose protamine [29(15.2%) vs 50(7.1%), p<0.001]. This was confirmed after propensity matching (n=130 for each groups) for relevant clinical characteristics with a significant higher bleeding risk of low-dose protamine receiving patients including anti-platelet therapy [19(14.6%) vs 6(4.6%), p=0.006]. Consistently, low-dose protamine predicted the combined endpoint (OR 3.54, 95%-CI 1.36 - 9.17, p=0.009). Even in multivariable analysis low-dose protamine continued to be a predictor of the combined endpoint in the matched model (OR 3.07, 95%-CI 1.17 - 8.08, p=0.023) alongside with baseline hemoglobin. 

Conclusions : Low-dose protamine regime is associated with a higher rate of major adverse events compared to a full-dose protamine regime following transfemoral TAVI. 

Table 1 : Basic Characteristics of Patients Before and After Matching 

 

 

Before Matching

After Matching

 

Overall (N = 897)

Full dose (N = 706)

Half dose (N = 191)

P-Value

Full dose (N = 130

Half dose (N = 130

P- Value

Median age (IQR)–year

82(78-85)

81(78-85)

82(79-85)

0.481

80(77-84)

82(78-85)

0.065

Male-no.(%)

440(49.1)

329(46.6)

111(58.1)

0.005

78(60.0%)

78(60.0%)

1.000

Median EuroSCORE (IQR)-%

15(10-23)

14.5(10-22)

18(11.4-26)

0.015

15.6(9.6-23.0)

15.2(10.5-25.5)

0.54

DM-no. (%)

320(35.7)

242(36.1)

84(44)

0.013

57(43.8%)

44(33.8%)

0.098

Hypertension-no.(%)

709(79.1)

560(79.3)

149(78)

0.787

101(77.7%)

98(76.0%)

0.742

PAD-no.(%)

140(15.6)

98(13.8)

42(22)

0.006

23(17.7%)

35(27.1%)

0.068

Median GFR (IQR)-ml/min/1.73 m2

56.7(41-73)

57(41-74)

55.5(39-69)

0.757

57(41-71)

53(38-69)

0.527

Median Hemoglobin (IQR)-g/dL

11.9(11-13)

11.9(11-13)

11.8(10.3-13)

0.06

12.3(11.2-13.7)

11.9(10.3-13.3)

0.024

CHD-no.(%)

609(67.8)

420(59.5)

189(100)

<0.001

99(76.2%)

127(97.7%)

<0.001

DAPT-no.(%)

157(17.5)

48(6.8)

109(57.1)

<0.001

48(36.9%)

48(36.9%)

1.000

NOAC/VKA-no.(%)

357(39.8)

269(38.2)

70(36.6)

0.693

52(40.0%)

42(32.3%)

0.197

Table 2 : Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Matched Model

 

Full dose (N=130)

Half dose (N=130)

 P-Value 

° Primary Endpoints 

 

 

 

Combined endpoint

6 (4.6%)

19 (14.6%)

0.006

In-hospital mortality

4 (3.1%)

7 (5.4%)

0.355

Life-threatening bleeding

1 (0.8%)

6 (4.6%)

0.055

Major bleeding

2 (1.5%)

8 (6.2%)

0.053

Major vascular complications

3 (2.3%)

7 (5.4%)

0.197

° Secondary Endpoints

 

 

 

Minor bleeding

13 (10%)

27 (20.9%)

0.015

Minor vascular complications 

32 (24.6%)

28 (21.5%)

0.652

Blood transfusion volume (units)

0.3±0.8

1.2±3.2

0.003


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2023/aP1315.html