Background: Severe injuries of the esophagus causing major complications after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation are rare. However, endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) have been described in up to 30% after radiofrequency current energy ablation. The novel non-thermal ablation technology pulsed field ablation (PFA) allows for unique ablation of the myocardium, sparing adjacent tissues, including the esophagus.

Objective: Due to the proximity of the esophagus to the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), this study sought to investigate the safety profile of PFA after left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAWPI) in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF 

Methods: Consecutive patients underwent PFA-guided catheter ablation for AF/atrial tachycardia including LAPWI. No esophagus probe was used due to the non-thermal energy form of PFA. To rule out esophageal lesions, all patients underwent post-procedural esophageal endoscopy, possibly, the next day.

Results: In total, 44 patients were included in the study. Patients’ mean age was 68 ± 13 years, 32 of 44 patients were male (72.7%) with a median CHA2DS2-VASc Score of 2 (q1-q3:1.5-4). Of all 44 PFA procedures, 13 (29.5%) were first ablation procedures for persistent AF and 31 (70.5%) were re-ablation procedures, including AF and AT. 

All patients underwent PFA-guided CA with a procedure duration of 113 ± 35.2 mins and a fluoroscopy time of 14.0 ± 5.7 mins. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and/or Re-PVI was performed in 32 (72.3%) of patients. Successful LAPWI with PFA was performed in all patients (100%) including one (1/44, 2.3%)% early reconnection during remapping that required additional PFA. Additional PFA (including roof line, anterior line and mitral isthmus ablation) was performed in 22/44 patients (50%).

Post-procedural endoscopy was performed at a median of one day after the procedure (q1-3: 1-2 days). No ablation-associated esophageal lesion was found (0%).

There was no tamponade, and only one minor groin complication (2.3%, AV fistula not requiring intervention). 

Summary: After pulsed field ablation, no EDEL were detected on post-procedural esophageal endoscopy. Therefore, AF ablation including left posterior wall isolation performed by pulsed field ablation seems to be safe regarding any collateral damage to the esophagus.