Clin Res Cardiol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02002-5 |
||
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients with Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation | ||
P. Doldi1, L. Stolz1, M. Orban1, N. Karam1, F. Pranz2, D. Kalbacher3, E. Lubos4, D. Braun1, M. Adamo5, B. Melica6, M. Näbauer1, S. Higuchi1, M. Wild1, M. Neuß7, C. Butter7, M. Kassar2, A. Petrescu8, R. Pfister9, C. Iliadis9, M. Unterhuber10, H. Thiele10, S. Baldus11, R. S. von Bardeleben12, N. Schofer3, C. Hagl13, A. S. Petronio14, S. Massberg1, S. Windecker2, P. Lurz10, M. Metra5, J. Hausleiter1 | ||
1Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München; 2Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Kardiologie Inselspital Bern, Bern, CH; 3Allgemeine und Interventionelle Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg; 4Kardiologie und Angiologie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus gGmbH, Hamburg; 5Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, IT; 6Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho, Porto, PT; 7Herzzentrum Brandenburg / Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau, Bernau bei Berlin; 8Zentrum für Kardiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz; 9Klinik III für Innere Medizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Köln; 10Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Leipzig; 11Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Köln; 12Zentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz; 13Herzchirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München; 14Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, IT; | ||
Background Among patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), atrial functional MR (aFMR) represents an underrecognized entity. Data regarding outcomes after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) remain scarce. Objective The objective was to analyse the outcome of aFMR patients undergoing M-TEER. Methods and results Using patients of the international EuroSMR registry undergoing M-TEER for SMR, we analysed baseline characteristics and 2-year outcomes according the presence of aFMR. Patients were considered to have aFMR showing preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%) without any regional wall motion abnormalities, Carpentier Type I leaflet motion and dilated left atria. Furthermore, the impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) defined as RV/PA coupling (TAPSE/sPAP), on outcomes after M-TEER was assessed. A total number of 126 patients corresponding to 8% of the EuroSMR registry, 61% female, with a median age of 80 years (76 to 83yrs) were included in the analysis. The rate of atrial fibrillation was 79% and NYHA functional class III or higher was present in 86%. MR severity in aFMR patients was substantially reduced after M-TEER. Procedural success defined as MR ≤2+ at the end of the procedure was 87.2% and 62.4% showed MR ≤1+, Figure 1A. NYHA functional class significantly improved after M-TEER. The estimated overall 2-year survival rate was 70.4% (62 to 80%), Figure 1B. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard models identified baseline NYHA class IV (HR 3.49, 95% CI: 1.67, 7.30, p=<0.001) and RVD (HR 2.72, 95% CI: 1.28, 5.76, p=0.009) as independent predictors for 2-year mortality in aFMR patients. Patients with RVD showed significantly impaired 2-year survival (HR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.24 to 6.45; p=0.014, Figure 2). Conclusion M-TEER in aFMR is effective and reduces heart failure symptoms at follow-up. AFMR is not rare and an earlier treatment – before RVD develops – might be associated with better outcomes. |
||
https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2022/aV1706.html |