Clin Res Cardiol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02002-5

Association of self-reported health status and physical fitness with objectively assessed physical performance in the general population: Findings from the STAAB program
N. Moser1, F. Sahiti1, V. Cejka1, M. Kohls2, J. Albert1, S. Frantz3, F. Eichner2, S. Störk1, P. U. Heuschmann2, G. Gelbrich2, C. Morbach4, für die Studiengruppe: STAAB
1Deutsches Zentrum für Herzinsuffizienz, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg; 2Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg; 3Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg; 4Medizinische Klinik I, Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg;

Background
Simple self-assessment questions on health status and physical performance might be helpful tools to assess physical capacity in the general population. We quantified the association of self-reported health status and physical fitness with measured physical performance in the general population.

 

Methods
The prospective Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A-B and Determinants of Progression (STAAB) cohort study investigates a representative sample of residents of the City of Würzburg, Germany, aged 30 to 79 years, without a history of HF. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) as an objective measure of physical performance was assessed in a 15-m hallway under strictly standardized conditions. Further, all participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire: the answer to question #1 (“how would you describe your health status in general?”) was categorized into “excellent” (excellent or very good), “good” (good) and “poor” (fair or poor). Question #2 asked about a potential impairment in daily physical activities; answers were categorized as follows: “excellent” (no limitation of physical activity), “limited” (minor limitation, e.g. when climbing one flight of stairs/walking one block), and “moderate” (all other participants). We determined the association of the different categories with 6MWD applying a generalized linear model.

 

Results
We here report on 2952 individuals with valid 6MWD: 52% women; mean age 58±11 years. Prevalence of self-reported “excellent”, “good” and “poor” general health was 38% (54% men, 54±11 years), 53% (45% men, 60±11 years), and 9% (43% men, 61±10 years), respectively. Prevalence of self-reported “excellent”, “moderate”, and “limited” physical fitness was 42% (53% men, 53±11years), 50% (45% men, 60±10 years), and 9% (38%men, 64±10 years), respectively. 6MWD in the different categories of self-reported general health (best to worst category) was 572±72 m, 527±85 m, and 492±104 m, respectively (p<0.001; fig. 1a). 6MWD in the different categories of physical fitness (best to worst category) was 573±75 m, 529±80 m, and 462±104 m, respectively (p<0.001; fig. 1b), without differences between men and women (all p>0.05).

 

Conclusions
In a representative sample of the general population, we found a strong association between self-reported and objective physical performance and general health. This implies a valid self-perception of the current health status and encourages the use of simple self-assessment questions in primary prevention and screening on a population level. Our results require validation in other population-based cohorts as well as in patient collectives.






https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2022/aV114.html