Clin Res Cardiol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02002-5 |
||
Glycaemic control and insulin therapy are significant confounders of the obesity paradox in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus | ||
H. Fröhlich1, A. Bossmeyer1, S. Kazmi2, K. Goode2, S. Agewall3, D. Atar4, N. Frey1, J. Cleland5, L. Frankenstein1, A. Clark2, T. Täger1 | ||
1Klinik für Innere Med. III, Kardiologie, Angiologie u. Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg; 2Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK; 3Department for Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevål, Oslo, NO; 4Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevål, Oslo, NO; 5Robertson Centre for Biostatistics & Clinical Trials, Glasgow, UK; | ||
Background: A high body mass index (BMI) confers a paradoxical survival benefit in patients with heart failure (HF) or diabetes mellitus (DM). There is, however, controversy whether an obesity paradox is also present in patients with HF and concomitant DM. In addition, the influence of glycaemic control and diabetes treatment on the presence or absence of the obesity paradox in patients with HF and DM is unknown. Methods: We identified 2,967 patients with
HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the HF registries of the
universities of Heidelberg, Germany, and Hull, UK (general sample). Of these, 600
(20%) were treated for concomitant DM (DM subgroup). The relationship between
BMI and all-cause mortality was analysed in both the general sample and the DM
subgroup. Patients with concomitant DM were stratified according to HbA1c levels
or type of diabetes treatment and analyses were repeated. Results: We found an inverse BMI-mortality
relationship in both the general sample and the DM subgroup. However, the
obesity paradox was less pronounced in diabetic patients treated with insulin
and it disappeared in those with poor glycaemic control as defined by HbA1c
levels >7.5%.
Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, a higher BMI is associated with better survival irrespective of concomitant DM. However, insulin treatment and poor glycaemic control make the relationship much weaker. |
||
https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2022/aP1842.html |