Clin Res Cardiol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02002-5

Real-time CMR Imaging for Non-Invasive Characterisation of HFpEF: Medium-Term Outcomes of the HFpEF Stress Trial
S. J. Backhaus1, S. Rösel1, A. Schulz1, T. Lange1, K. Hellenkamp1, R. Gertz2, R. Wachter3, M. Steinmetz4, S. Kutty5, U. Raaz1, T. Friede6, T. Seidler1, M. Uecker7, G. Hasenfuß1, A. Schuster1
1Herzzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen; 2Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln; 3Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig; 4Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen; 5Taussig Heart Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, US; 6Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen; 7Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität Graz, Graz, AT;

Background:
The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Recently, the HFpEF Stress Trial demonstrated feasibility and accuracy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time exercise-stress atrial function imaging for early identification of HFpEF. However, no outcome data has yet been presented.

Methods:
The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively recruited 75 patients with dyspnea on exertion and echocardiographic preserved EF and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e’>8). 68 patients entered the final study cohort and were characterized as HFpEF (n=34) or non-cardiac dyspnea (n=34) according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥15mmHg stress: ≥25mmHg). These patients were contacted by telephone and hospital charts were reviewed. Clinical endpoints included cardiovascular hospitalisation and mortality.

Results:
Follow-up was performed after 24 months; 2 patients were lost to follow-up. HFpEF patients were numerically more often hospitalized compared to non-cardiac dyspnea but not reaching statistical significance (8 vs. 3, p=0.123). There were no cardiovascular deaths. Hospitalised patients during follow-up had higher H2FPEF scores (5 vs. 3, p=0.004), and impaired left atrial (LA) function at rest (p≤0.006) and stress (p≤0.009). Impairment of CMR-derived atrial function parameters at rest and during exercise-stress (p≤0.009) was associated with increased likelihood for cardiovascular hospitalisation, independently of the presence of atrial fibrillation (p<0.05 for all). LA reservoir function at rest showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.87) and yielded significant incremental prognostic value compared to clinical biomarkers (NTproBNP), echocardiographic imaging (E/e’) and invasive RHC (PCWP) parameters.

Conclusions:
Left atrial peak reservoir strain at rest emerged as the strongest predictor for medium-term outcome in the HFpEF Stress Trial. A combination of rest and exercise-stress CMR imaging may allow more accurate diagnostic and prognostic stratification in HFpEF.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2022/aP1222.html