Clin Res Cardiol (2021)
DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w
|
Novel cryoballoon ablation system for single short pulmonary vein isolation: The prospective ICE-AGE X study
|
C.-H. Heeger1, R. Meyer-Saraei2, C. Eitel3, T. Fink1, V. Sciacca1, H. L. Phan1, N. Große1, B. Fahimi2, S. Reincke3, A. Keelani2, L. Delgado Lopez2, A. Traub1, F. Ouyang4, K.-H. Kuck5, J. Vogler1, R. R. Tilz1
|
1Medizinische Klinik II / Kardiologie, Angiologie, Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck; 2Campuszentrum Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck; 3Med. Klinik II / Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck; 4Kardiologie, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg; 5Kardiologie, LANS Cardio Hamburg, Hamburg;
|
Aims: The arctic front cryoballon (AF-CB) provides
effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging
clinical outcome data. The novel POLARx cryoballoon incorporates unique
features and design changes which may translate into improved efficacy, safety and
further simplified balloon based PVI procedures.
Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal
or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were prospectively enrolled, underwent POLARx
based PVI (POLARx group) and were compared to 25 consecutive patients treated
with the fourth generation AF-CB (CB4, AF-CB4 group).
Results: A total of 100
(POLARx) and 97 (AF-CB4) pulmonary veins (PV) were identified and all PVs were successfully
isolated utilizing the POLARx and AF-CB4, respectively. A significant difference regarding the mean
minimal cryoballoon temperatures reached using the AF-CB4 and POLARx (-50±6°C versus -57±7°C, p=0.004) was observed. Real-time PVI was visualized in 81% of
patients (POLARX) and 42% of patients (AF-CB4), respectively (p<0.001). Despite a
certain learning curve utilizing the POLARx a trend towards shorter median procedure
time (POLARx: 45 (39, 53) minutes vs AF-CB4: 55 (50, 60) minutes (p=0.062) was found.
No
differences were observed between AF-CB4 and POLARx concerning
catheter maneuverability, catheter stability and periprocedural complications.
Conclusions: The novel
POLARx showed similar safety and efficacy compared to the AF-CB4. A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings
and significantly lower minimal balloon temperatures have been observed using
the POLARx as compared to AF-CB4.
|
https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP987.html
|