Clin Res Cardiol (2021)
DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w

Urinary NT-proBNP: associated with progression of chronic kidney disease in ICD patients
R. Allgaier1, C. Strack1, S. Wallner2, U. Hubauer1, E. Ücer1, P. Lehn2, A. Keyser3, A. Luchner4, L. S. Maier1, C. G. Jungbauer1
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Med. II, Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg; 2Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg; 3Herz-, Thorax- und herznahe Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg; 4Klinik für Kardiologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg;

Aims: Chronic heart failure is often accompanied by chronic kidney disease (CKD). Interdependency of both is described as cardiorenal syndrome. Plasmatic NT-proBNP represents an established marker for heart failure. Previous studies suggested urinary NT-proBNP has potential as marker of chronic heart failure as well. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic capability of urinary NT-proBNP regarding cardiorenal syndrome, especially regarding progression of CKD in patients with ICD and chronic heart failure.

Methods: 313 ICD patients were included in the study. NT-proBNP was assessed in plasmatic and fresh spot urine. Urinary NT-proBNP was normalized to urinary creatinine. Follow up was performed after 51 months (IQR 25-55) and the progress of renal function was evaluated by semiannual glomerular filtration rate (eGFR CKD-EPI) values. Further, data regarding ICD shock therapies and all cause mortality were obtained. Outcomes of interest were continuous progression of CKD and a combined endpoint of continuous progression of CKD, ICD shock therapies and all-cause mortality. Continuous progression of CKD was defined by consistent decline in eGFR category accompanied by a 25% drop of baseline eGFR.

Results: Average four (IQR 2-6) follow up values of serum creatinine per patient were obtained. CKD was evident in 127 patients (40.6%). During follow up 29 patients (9.3%) developed a continuous progression of CKD. Plasmatic NT-proBNP as well as urinary NT-proBNP were significantly elevated in patients with continuous progression of CKD (p < 0.001). According to Kaplan Meier analysis, plasmatic NT-proBNP median as well as urinary NT-proBNP median were significant predictors for continuous CKD progression and the combined endpoint (each p < 0.01). In Cox regression analysis, plasmatic as well as urinary NT-proBNP were independent predictors for continuous CKD progression, beside diabetes and serum creatinine (each p < 0.02). Further, plasmatic as well as urinary NT-proBNP were independent predictors for the combined endpoint (each p < 0.02).

Conclusion: Urinary NT-proBNP and plasmatic NT-proBNP show similar prognostic capabilities regarding prognosis of the cardiorenal syndrome, especially regarding progression of CKD.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP853.html