Clin Res Cardiol (2021)
DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w

CMR Feature Tracking Strain Patterns in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy – and their association with Circulating Cardiac Biomarkers
E. Cavus1, K. Müllerleile1, S. Schellert1, J. N. Schneider1, E. Tahir2, C. Chevalier1, C. M. Jahnke1, U. K. Radunski3, G. Adam2, S. Blankenberg1, G. K. Lund2, M. Avanesov2, M. Patten-Hamel1
1Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg; 2Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; 3Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Regio Klinikum Elmshorn, Elmshorn;

Background: CMR feature tracking strain (CMR-FT) offers a precise assessment of myocardial deformation and provides prognostic information in several cardiac diseases. However, there is a paucity of data on the role of CMR-FT in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We therefore sought to analyze global CMR-FT parameters in all four cardiac chambers and potential associations with NT-proBNP levels and cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) in patients with HCM. 

Methods: This retrospective study included 144 HCM patients who underwent clinically indicated CMR at 1.5 T and 16 healthy controls. CMR-FT analyses were performed on standard steady state free precession cine (SSFP) CMR data using a commercially available software. Left ventricular (LV) strain was assessed as global longitudinal strain (LVLAX-GLS), global circumferential strain (LVLAX-GCS) and global radial strain (LVLAX-GRS) on long-axis (LAX) and as LVSAX-GCS and LVSAX-GRS on short-axis (SAX) slices. Right ventricular (RV-GLS), left atrial (LA-GLS) and right atrial (RA-GLS) strain were assessed on LAX slices. 

Results: We found LVLAX-GLS (-18.9 [-22.0, -16.0] vs. -23.5 [-25.5, -22.0] %, p=0.0001), LVSAX-GRS (86.8 [65.9-115.5] vs. 119.6 [91.3-143.7] %, p=0.001) and LALAX-GLS (LA2CH-GLS 29.2 [19.1-37.7] vs. LA2CH-GLS 38.2 [34.3-47.1] %, p=0.0036 and LA4CH-GLS 22.4 [14.6-30.7] vs. LA4CH-GLS 33.4 [28.4-37.3] %,p=0.0033) to be impaired in HCM patients compared to healthy controls despite normal LVEF in both groups. Furthermore, all global LV and LA strain parameters were impaired in HCM patients with elevated NT-proBNP and/or hsTnT, despite preserved LVEF and a similar degree of diastolic dysfunction compared to HCM patients with normal biomarker levels. There was a moderate correlation of LV and LA CMR-FT strain with levels of circulating NT-proBNP and hsTnT.

Conclusion: CMR-FT reveals LV and LA dysfunction in HCM patients despite normal LVEF. The association between impaired LV strain and elevated NT-proBNP or hsTnT levels indicates a link between unapparent functional abnormalities and disease severity in HCM.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP371.html