Clin Res Cardiol (2021)
DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w

Prognostic Stratification of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction soon after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI
M. Reindl1, T. Stiermaier2, I. Lechner1, C. Tiller1, M. Holzknecht1, A. Mayr3, J. Schwaiger4, C. Brenner1, G. Klug1, A. Bauer1, H. Thiele5, H.-J. Feistritzer5, B. Metzler1, I. Eitel2, S. J. Reinstadler1
1Department für Innere Medizin III - Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AT; 2Medizinische Klinik II / Kardiologie, Angiologie, Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck; 3Department für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, AT; 4Department für Innere Medizin, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Hall, 6060, AT; 5Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Leipzig;

Background: A significant proportion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) soon after the acute event, yet, it is largely unknown how to risk stratify them.

Objectives: To assess the prognostic value of clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) risk markers in a large STEMI population with preserved LVEF following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: This multicenter, individual patient-data analysis from two large CMR trials included 1247 STEMI patients. CMR examinations were conducted 3 (interquartile range[IQR]:2-4) days after PCI. LVEF, infarct size, microvascular obstruction (MVO) and LV strain values were measured. Primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, re-infarction and congestive heart failure.

Results: A preserved LVEF (≥50%) was observed in 724 patients (58%). In total, 97 patients experienced a MACE event, 34 MACE events (35%) occurred in the group with preserved LVEF. TIMI risk score (hazard ratio[HR]:1.28[95%CI:1.02-1.59];p=0.03) and female gender (HR:2.24[95%CI:1.10-4.57];p=0.03) emerged as independent clinical determinants of MACE in the preserved LVEF group. Among CMR parameters, presence of MVO (HR:2.19[95%CI:1.02-4.75];p=0.04) and global longitudinal strain (GLS; HR:1.15[95%CI:1.04-1.28];p=0.01) independently predicted MACE in the preserved LVEF population. The addition of MVO and GLS to the clinical prognostic markers (TIMI risk score and female gender) increased (p=0.02) the prognostic validity (AUC:0.76[95%CI:0.73-0.79]) as compared to the clinical markers alone (AUC:0.65[0.62-0.69]).

Conclusions: In contemporary treated STEMI patients showing preserved LVEF, a CMR-based risk prediction approach assessing MVO and GLS provided strong prognostic value that was incremental to clinical outcome parameters.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP1206.html