Clin Res Cardiol (2021)
DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair In Patients With Atrial Secondary Mitral Regurgitation And Right Ventricular Dysfunction
P. Doldi1, M. Orban1, L. Stolz1, C. Butter2, F. Praz3, S. Baldus4, N. Karam1, E. Lubos5, R. S. von Bardeleben6, P. Lurz7, M. Näbauer1, J. Hausleiter1
1Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München; 2Herzzentrum Brandenburg / Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau, Bernau bei Berlin; 3Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, CH; 4Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Köln; 5Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg; 6Zentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz; 7Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Leipzig;

Aims:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on long-term survival outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) for both, atrial secondary mitral valve regurgitation (ASMR) and HFrEF-associated secondary mitral valve regurgitation (SMR).

Methods and results:

We included a cohort of 778 patients with edge-to-edge treatment of severe SMR between 2008 and 2019 from 8 experienced European centres. RVD was defined as RV-PA-Coupling (TAPSE/PASP ratio) <0.274 mm/mmHg, derived from receiver operating characteristics analysis. Patients have been divided into two groups according to the aetiology of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and the impact of RVD and two-year survival was analysed accordingly. Overall procedural success defined as postprocedural MR ≤ 2+ was achieved in 92.7% of the patients. Within the ASMR group, 2-year survival was 76.6% (95% CI, 68.3 to 85.9) among patients with preserved RV function and 66.0% (95% CI, 48.0 to 90.9) among patients with RVD (hazard ratio for death, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.83 to 4.59; p = 0.125 by log-rank test, Figure 1). Patients in the HFrEF group showed significantly higher mortality when RVD was present (hazard ratio for death, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.81; p < 0.001 by log-rank test, Figure 2).

Conclusion:

TMVR effectively reduces SMR of both etiologies:  ASMR and HFrEF-associated SMR). RVD is an important predictor for increased mortality in both ASMR and HFrEF associated patients.


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP1089.html