Clin Res Cardiol (2021) DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01843-w |
||
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair In Patients With Atrial Secondary Mitral Regurgitation And Right Ventricular Dysfunction | ||
P. Doldi1, M. Orban1, L. Stolz1, C. Butter2, F. Praz3, S. Baldus4, N. Karam1, E. Lubos5, R. S. von Bardeleben6, P. Lurz7, M. Näbauer1, J. Hausleiter1 | ||
1Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München; 2Herzzentrum Brandenburg / Kardiologie, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau, Bernau bei Berlin; 3Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, CH; 4Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Herzzentrum der Universität zu Köln, Köln; 5Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg; 6Zentrum für Kardiologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz; 7Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Leipzig; | ||
Aims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) on long-term survival outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) for both, atrial secondary mitral valve regurgitation (ASMR) and HFrEF-associated secondary mitral valve regurgitation (SMR).
Methods and results: We included a cohort of 778 patients with edge-to-edge treatment of severe SMR between 2008 and 2019 from 8 experienced European centres. RVD was defined as RV-PA-Coupling (TAPSE/PASP ratio) <0.274 mm/mmHg, derived from receiver operating characteristics analysis. Patients have been divided into two groups according to the aetiology of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and the impact of RVD and two-year survival was analysed accordingly. Overall procedural success defined as postprocedural MR ≤ 2+ was achieved in 92.7% of the patients. Within the ASMR group, 2-year survival was 76.6% (95% CI, 68.3 to 85.9) among patients with preserved RV function and 66.0% (95% CI, 48.0 to 90.9) among patients with RVD (hazard ratio for death, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.83 to 4.59; p = 0.125 by log-rank test, Figure 1). Patients in the HFrEF group showed significantly higher mortality when RVD was present (hazard ratio for death, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.81; p < 0.001 by log-rank test, Figure 2). Conclusion: TMVR effectively reduces SMR of both etiologies: ASMR and HFrEF-associated SMR). RVD is an important predictor for increased mortality in both ASMR and HFrEF associated patients. |
||
https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/jt2021/aP1089.html |