Clin Res Cardiol 107, Suppl 1, April 2018

Risk benefit analyses for acute kidney failure or hyperkalaemia – a network meta-analysis of available aldosterone antagonists in chronic heart failure
H. Fröhlich1, T. Täger1, M. Seiz1, H. A. Katus1, L. Frankenstein1
1Klinik für Innere Med. III, Kardiologie, Angiologie u. Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg;

Background: Aldosterone antagonists (AAs) improve mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, they may also cause acute renal failure and hyperkalaemia. The relative risk-benefit ratio of the available AAs spironolactone, eplerenone and canrenone with respect to acute renal failure and hyperkalaemia is unclear.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis following PRISMA-P and PRISMA-NMA guidelines. 7 individual databases, 6 individual clinical trial registries, and 3 individual grey literature databases were searched up to January 2017 for randomized controlled trials with an active treatment of either spironolactone, eplerenone, or canrenone/potassium-canreonate in adults with symptomatic CHF due to systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%) reporting on acute renal failure or hyperkalaemia. The pooled effect estimates were ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

 

Results: We identified 5 trials including 4,923 CHF patients informing on acute kidney failure and hyperkaliaemia as safety endpoints. The relevant network plot is shown in figure 1.


Figure 1: Network plot. The coloured edges (green) indicate an average low-level of risk of bias in trials according to the GRADE) approach weighted according to the number of studies per comparison.


Beta-blocker adjusted predictive interval plots and cumulative ranking probabilities for SUCRA-values are shown in
figures 2 -5.

They appear to favour spironolactone over eplerenone (OR: 3.47 [1.44-8.37]; spironolactone as reference) for acute kidney failure but did not reach significance for hyperkalaemia (OR: 18.51 [0.98-350.44]).

Figure 2:  Beta-blocker adjusted predictive interval plot (acute kidney failure). CAN, canrenone; PLA, Placebo; EPLE, eplerenone; SPIRO, spironolactone.




Figure 3:
Cumulative ranking probability plots for beta-blocker adjusted SUCRA-values (acute kidney failure). CAN, canrenone; PLA, Placebo; EPLE, eplerenone; SPIRO, spironolactone.



Figure 4:
Beta-blocker adjusted predictive interval plot (hyperkalaemia). CAN, canrenone; PLA, Placebo; EPLE, eplerenone; SPIRO, spironolactone.

Figure 5: Cumulative ranking probability plots for beta-blocker adjusted SUCRA-values (hyperkalaemia). CAN, canrenone; PLA, Placebo; EPLE, eplerenone; SPIRO, spironolactone.

 

Conclusion: The risk-benefit ratio of spironolactone with respect to acute renal failure and hyperkalaemia appears favourable as compared to eplerenone.


http://www.abstractserver.de/dgk2018/jt/abstracts//P1693.htm