Clin Res Cardiol (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02087-y

Safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation in elderly patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
D. Lawin1, C. Stellbrink1, K. Marx1, T. Lawrenz1
1Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum OWL der Universität Bielefeld, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld;

Background: Several studies indicate safety and efficacy of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). However, patients with advanced age ≥75 years have not been adequately represented in these studies. 

Methods and Results: All consecutive ASAs, which were performed at our institution between 1997 and 2021, were allocated to a group of patients ≥75 years (n=208; group A) and to a group <75 years (n=1,430; group B). At baseline group A patients had more often female sex (85.1% vs. 42.0%; p<0.0001) and coronary artery disease (21.3% vs. 12.2%; p=0.0004), lower distances in 6MWT (317.0m [IQR 242.0-389.0] vs. 438.0m [IQR 353.3-504.0]; p<0.0001) and more severe symptoms (NYHA 2.96±0.60 vs. 2.65±0.69; p<0.0001).

The exercise-induced LVOTG at baseline was 123.0mmHg (IQR 86.0-160.0) in group A vs. 110.0mmHg (IQR 69.0-150.0) in group B (p=0.0050) but this was not statistically significant after application of Bonferroni correction. At mid-term follow-up (FU) 6 months after ASA exercise-induced LVOTG was lower in group A (29.5mmHg [IQR 18.0-54.0] vs. 39.5mmHg [IQR 23.0-73.8]; p=0.0007; Figure 1). There were no differences with regard to the improvement of exercise-induced LVOTG from baseline to FU (group A: 58.0mmHg IQR 27.5-106.0]; group B: 67.0mmHg [30.0-103.0]; p=n.s.). 

NYHA class significantly improved in both groups (p<0.0001). The distance walked in 6MWT at FU was lower in group A (370.5m [288.3-440.8] vs. 511.0m [440.0-590.8]; p<0.0001). The improvement in 6MWT was not statistically different after Bonferroni correction (24.0m [IQR -8.5-94.5] in group A vs. 76.0m [25.0-131.0] in group B; p=0.0013). More group A patients (25.5 %) developed persistent AV block after ASA (vs. 13.6 %; p<0.0001; Figure 2). Thus, more group A patients (24.0 %) needed a PM after ASA (vs. 11.0; p<0.0001; Table 4). There were no differences regarding intrahospital mortality (group A: 1.0 %; group B: 0.6 %; p=n.s.) or mortality during FU (group A: 1.5 %; group B: 0.5 %; p=n.s.).

Conclusion: ASA was safe and effective even in patients with more advance age ≥75 years despite more severe symptoms and lower distances walked in 6MWT at baseline. Elderly patients had lower exercise-induced LVOTG at FU but the extent of improvement was not different compared to patients <75years. Thus, ASA should be considered even for elderly patients with symptomatic HOCM despite drug therapy.

Figure 1 Exercise-induced LVOTG (in mmHg) calculated using CW-doppler in patients ≥ 75 and < 75 years of age at baseline and at mid-term FU 6 months after ASA. * = p<0.0011. n.s. = not significant after application of Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple testing.

Figure 2 Incidence of persistent AV block after ASA in patients ≥ 75 and < 75 years of age. * = p<0.0011. 


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/ht2022/aPP261.html