Clin Res Cardiol (2021). 10.1007/s00392-021-01933-9

DURABILITY OF PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION AT REPEAT ABLATION AFTER INITIAL CRYOBALLOON ABLATION
L. Rieß1, J. Pongratz1, U. Dorwarth1, M. Wankerl1, F. Straube1, E. Hoffmann1
1Klinik für Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München;

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation in AF patients. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is a safe and effective strategy to achieve durable PVI in the first procedure, however patients still experience recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. The aim was to assess the durability of PVI in patients undergoing repeat ablation after initial advanced CBA.

 

Methods: From the local prospective observational single-center registry all patients undergoing repeat ablation after initial CBA due to recurrence were included in this analysis. Patients with a prior first generation CBA or RFA were excluded. At repeat ablation, 3D electroanatomical imaging of the LA was performed prior to RFA. 

 

Results: A total of 2,410 patients underwent cryoballoon PVI (CBG 2,3,4) between May 2012 and March 2021 at our center. After a median FU of 15 months, 219 patients (9.1%) underwent repeat ablation, after initial advanced CBA. 53 (24%) of the patients presented with paroxysmal AF, 166 (76%) with persistent AF. Median age was 70 years. 127 (58%) were male, 93 (42%) were female. 139 patients (63.4%) showed durable PVI of all veins. 87 % of the veins were still isolated. Details are shown in table 1 and 2. 

 

Conclusion: Cryoballoon ablation is an effective procedure to achieve durable PVI. Hence at repeat ablation PV reconnection is not common anymore. Strategies for PVI non-responders should be defined in the future. Detailed analysis and understanding of the underlying mechanism of the arrhythmia, substrate analysis and individualized ablation might require high-density mapping in the second ablation procedure. 

 

Table 1                                                                     

Number of PV with reconnection

Number of patients with repeat ablation  N = 219

 0

139 ( 63.4%)

1

60 (27.4%)

2

16 (7.3%)

3

2 (0.9%)

4

2 (0.9%)

5

0


Table 1          

PV

Durable Isolation in %

all PV

87

LSPV

86.1

LIPV

90.7

RIPV

89.2

RSPV

83.8

RMPV

50

LCPV

72.7

 

 


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/ht2021/P81.htm