Clin Res Cardiol (2021). 10.1007/s00392-021-01933-9

Influence of restoration of sinus rhythm on tricuspid regurgitation in patients with atrial arrhythmias – A prospective observational study
F. Schwarz1, M. Reinthaler1, U. Landmesser1, P. Attanasio1, M. Huemer1
1CC 11: Med. Klinik für Kardiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin;

Backround: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is classified as either primary TR (dysfunctional valve leaflets), secondary (functional) TR or a combination of both. As functional TR may be caused or worsened by atrial arrhythmias, restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) may reduce TR. This study is designed to collect prospective data of tricuspid function after SR restoration.

Methods: Patients with atrial arrhythmias (Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (Aflut)) were screened for tricuspid valve insufficiency using echocardiography prior to cardioversion or radiofrequency ablation. Patients with at least moderate TR were included. Clinical, ECG and echocardiographic follow up was scheduled three months after restoration of SR.

Results: 23 patients (59.1% (13/22) female, 76.8 ± 8.2 years old) were included. At follow up, 86.4% (19/22) were still in SR. Echocardiographic follow up showed significant reduction in TR (see figure 1), accompanied by right atrial volume and right ventricular inflow tract size reduction (see table 1). In patients with recurrent AF/Aflut TR reduction was not observed.

Conclusion: This prospective study shows significant improvement of TR after restoring SR. This suggests SR restoration should be discussed as part of TR therapy.

  

  
Figure 1 (TR severity baseline and follow-up, shown in %) 

Parameter

Baseline

Follow-up

p-value

HR

mean ± sd

105.7±24.1

68.4±9.5

p<0.0001

LVEF

mean ± sd

45±14.3

53.4±9.6

p=0.003

TAPSE

mean ± sd

19.2±5.3

21.9±5.9

p=0.65

PAP

mean ± sd

41.3±11.2

37.4±10.7

p=0.14

LAV

mean ± sd

97.5±26

87.6±28

p=0.02

RAV

mean ± sd

80±28.1

62.1±28.9

p=0.001

TR Severity

mild

n (%)

0 (0)

12 (54.5)

moderate

n (%)

16 (27.3)

9 (41)

severe

n (%)

6 (72.7)

1 (4.5)

RVIT

mean ± sd

44.2±9.2

40.6±7.1

p=0.03

Tricuspid Valve - Vena Contracta

mean ± sd

6.2±2.5

3.4±2

p=0.006

MR Severity

mild

n (%)

9 (40.9)

16 (72.7)

moderate

n (%)

8 (36.4)

4 (18.2)

severe

n (%)

5(22.7)

2 (9.1)

Mitral Valve-Annulus

mean ± sd

40.4±3.2

39.8±5

p=0.65

Mitral Valve -Vena Contracta

mean ± sd

4.1±2.1

2.6±1.8

p=0.001

Intervention

 

 

 

 

Ablation

n (%)

8 (36.4)

 

 

Cardioversion

n (%)

14 (63.6)

 

 

Table 1: Echocardiographic parameters before and after SR restoration. HR=heart rate; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; TAPSE=tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; PAP=pulmonary artery pressure; LAV=left atrial volume; RAV=right atrial volume; MR=Mitral regurgitation; RVIT=right ventricular inflow tract 

 

 


https://dgk.org/kongress_programme/ht2021/P770.htm